Fit everything on one page
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4d66e0d90
commit
68b36e9522
124
paper.tex
124
paper.tex
@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
|
||||
\usepackage{float}
|
||||
\usepackage{titlesec}
|
||||
\usepackage{algorithmic}
|
||||
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
||||
\usepackage{siunitx}
|
||||
@ -27,6 +28,32 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\hyphenation{op-tical net-works semi-conduc-tor IEEE-Xplore}
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% Template modifications
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
\titlespacing*{\section}
|
||||
{0mm}{3mm}{1mm}
|
||||
|
||||
\makeatletter
|
||||
\def\@maketitle{%
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
\null
|
||||
\vspace*{-4mm}
|
||||
\begin{center}%
|
||||
{\Huge \linespread{0.9}\selectfont \@title \par}%
|
||||
{\large
|
||||
\lineskip .5em%
|
||||
\begin{tabular}[t]{c}%
|
||||
\@author
|
||||
\end{tabular}\par}%
|
||||
\end{center}%
|
||||
\vspace*{-8mm}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\makeatother
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% Inputs & Global Options
|
||||
@ -64,9 +91,7 @@
|
||||
\AtBeginBibliography{\footnotesize}
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% Title, Header, Footer, etc.
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% Custom commands
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand\todo[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
|
||||
@ -79,7 +104,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{The Effect of the Choice of Hydration Strategy on Average Academic
|
||||
\title{\vspace{-3mm}The Effect of the Choice of Hydration Strategy on
|
||||
Average Academic
|
||||
Performance}
|
||||
|
||||
\author{Some concerned fellow students%
|
||||
@ -98,11 +124,13 @@ Effect of the Choice of Hydration Strategy on Average Academic Performance}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
% \vspace*{-10mm}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{abstract}
|
||||
We evaluate the \todo{\ldots} and project that by using the right button of
|
||||
the water dispenser to fill up their water bottles, students can potentially
|
||||
gain up to \todo{5 minutes} of study time a day, which is equivalent to
|
||||
raising their grades by up to \todo{0.01} levels.
|
||||
raising their grades by up to \todo{0.01} points.
|
||||
\end{abstract}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
|
||||
@ -115,7 +143,7 @@ Effect of the Choice of Hydration Strategy on Average Academic Performance}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace*{-1mm}
|
||||
\vspace*{-5mm}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
@ -161,6 +189,7 @@ for the behavioral measurement $113$ in total.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace*{-4mm}
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\begin{axis}[
|
||||
width=0.8\columnwidth,
|
||||
@ -191,11 +220,25 @@ for the behavioral measurement $113$ in total.
|
||||
\caption{Flow rate of the water dispenser depending on the
|
||||
hydration strategy.}
|
||||
\label{fig:System}
|
||||
\vspace*{-2mm}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
Fig. \ref{fig:System} shows the results of the system measurement.
|
||||
We observe that $S_\text{L}$ is the slowest strategy, while $S_\text{R}$
|
||||
and $S_\text{B}$ are similar. Due to the small sample size and the
|
||||
unknown distribution, the test we chose to verify this observation is a Mann
|
||||
Whitney U test. We found that $S _\text{L}$ is faster than $S_\text{R}$ with a
|
||||
significance of $p < 0.0001$, while no significant statement could be made
|
||||
about $S_\text{R}$ and $S_\text{B}$.
|
||||
Fig. \ref{fig:Behavior} shows the results of the behavioral measurement.
|
||||
% During this part of the experiment, we also measured the time each participant
|
||||
% needed to fill up their bottle. Using the measured flowrates we calculated
|
||||
% the mean refill volume to be $\SI{673.92}{\milli\liter}$.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace*{-2mm}
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\begin{axis}[
|
||||
ybar,
|
||||
@ -224,20 +267,8 @@ for the behavioral measurement $113$ in total.
|
||||
\label{fig:Behavior}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
Fig. \ref{fig:System} shows the results of the system measurement.
|
||||
We observe that $S_\text{L}$ is the slowest strategy, while $S_\text{R}$
|
||||
and $S_\text{B}$ are similar. Due to the small sample size and the
|
||||
unknown distribution, the test we chose to verify this observation is a Mann
|
||||
Whitney U test. We found that $S _\text{L}$ is faster than $S_\text{R}$ with a
|
||||
significance of $p < 0.0001$, while no significant statement could be made
|
||||
about $S_\text{R}$ and $S_\text{B}$.
|
||||
Fig. \ref{fig:Behavior} shows the results of the behavioral measurement.
|
||||
% During this part of the experiment, we also measured the time each participant
|
||||
% needed to fill up their bottle. Using the measured flowrates we calculated
|
||||
% the mean refill volume to be $\SI{673.92}{\milli\liter}$.
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\section{Discussion}
|
||||
\section{Modelling}
|
||||
|
||||
We can consider the water dispenser and students as comprising a queueing
|
||||
system, specifically an M/G/1 queue \cite{stewart_probability_2009}.
|
||||
@ -252,7 +283,8 @@ where $S$ denotes the service time (i.e., the time spent refilling a bottle),
|
||||
$\lambda$ the mean arrival time, and $\rho = \lambda \cdot E\mleft\{
|
||||
S \mright\}$ the system utilization. Using our
|
||||
experimental data we can approximate all parameters and obtain
|
||||
\todo{$W \approx 123$}.
|
||||
\todo{$W \approx \SI{4}{\second}$}. The difference to always using
|
||||
the fastest strategy can be calculated as \todo{$\SI{5}{\second}$}.
|
||||
% We examine the effects of the choice of hydration strategy. To
|
||||
% this end, we start by estimating the potential time savings possible by always
|
||||
% choosing the fastest strategy:%
|
||||
@ -290,31 +322,45 @@ experimental data we can approximate all parameters and obtain
|
||||
% Using our experimental measurements we estimate $\todo{\Delta t =
|
||||
% \SI{20}{\second}}$
|
||||
|
||||
Many attempts have been made in the literature to relate the time spent
|
||||
studying to academic achievement - see, e.g.
|
||||
\cite{schuman_effort_1985, zulauf_use_1999, michaels_academic_1989,
|
||||
dickinson_effect_1990}.
|
||||
The overwhelming consensus is that there is a significant relationship,
|
||||
though it is a weak one.
|
||||
Strangely, it is the consensus of current research that there is only
|
||||
a weak relationship between academic performance and invested time
|
||||
\cite{plant_why_2005}. Using the highest determined correlation we
|
||||
could find, \todo{$\rho = 0.18$ \cite{schuman_effort_1985}}, we
|
||||
estimate an upper bound on the possible grade gain of \todo{0.001}.
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\section{Discussion and Conclusion}
|
||||
|
||||
Further research is needed to consolidate and expand on the results
|
||||
of this paper, e.g., by expanding on the modelling of the arrival
|
||||
process or further investigating the relationship between the study
|
||||
time and the resulting grade for the target demographic.
|
||||
Nevertheless, we believe this study serves as a solid first step
|
||||
towards the optimization of the study behaviour of KIT students and
|
||||
thus the betterment of society in general.
|
||||
|
||||
% Many attempts have been made in the literature to relate
|
||||
% the time spent studying to academic achievement - see, e.g.
|
||||
% \cite{schuman_effort_1985, zulauf_use_1999, michaels_academic_1989,
|
||||
% dickinson_effect_1990}.
|
||||
% The overwhelming consensus is that there is a significant relationship,
|
||||
% though it is a weak one.
|
||||
%
|
||||
\todo{
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Compute possible grade gain
|
||||
\end{itemize}}
|
||||
%Many of the studies were only performed over
|
||||
% a period of one week or even day, so we believe care should be taken when
|
||||
% generlizing these results. Nevertheless, the overwhelming consensus in the
|
||||
% literature is that a significant relationship exists, though it is a weak one.
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
% \section{Conclusion}
|
||||
|
||||
In this study, we investigated how the choice of hydration strategy affects
|
||||
the average academic performance. We found that always choosing to
|
||||
press the right button leads to an average time gain of \todo{\SI{10}{\second}}
|
||||
per day, which translates into a grade improvement of $\todo{0.001}$ levels.
|
||||
We thus propose a novel and broadly applicable strategy to boost the average
|
||||
academic performance of KIT students: always pressing the right button.
|
||||
In this study, we investigated how the choice of hydration strategy
|
||||
affects the average academic performance. We found that always
|
||||
choosing to press the right button leads to an average time gain of
|
||||
\todo{\SI{10}{\second}} \todo{per day}, which translates into a grade
|
||||
improvement of $\todo{0.001}$ levels. We thus propose a novel and
|
||||
broadly applicable strategy to boost the average academic performance
|
||||
of KIT students: always pressing the right button.
|
||||
|
||||
% Further research is needed to develop a better model of how the choice of
|
||||
% hydration strategy is related to academic performance. We
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user