Add outline and main content points for QEC Meeting presentation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,9 +6,11 @@
|
||||
\usepackage[minted, most]{tcolorbox}
|
||||
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||
\usepackage{bm}
|
||||
\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}
|
||||
\usepackage{siunitx}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphics}
|
||||
\usepackage{xfp}
|
||||
\usepackage{quantikz}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||||
\usepackage[scaled=.92]{helvet}
|
||||
@@ -126,12 +128,107 @@ decorations.pathreplacing, calc}
|
||||
\section{Motivation and Core Idea}
|
||||
\label{sec:Motivation and Core Idea}
|
||||
|
||||
\newsavebox{\innercircuit}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Syndrome Extraction Circuits for Fault-Tolerant QEC}
|
||||
\frametitle{Sliding-Window Decoding for Fault-Tolerant QEC}
|
||||
|
||||
% \vspace*{-5mm}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\scalebox{0.8}{
|
||||
\savebox{\innercircuit}{
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}[
|
||||
block/.style={draw, rectangle, minimum
|
||||
height=1cm, minimum width=1.2cm, align=center,
|
||||
fill=white, font=\small},
|
||||
container/.style={draw, thick, inner sep=0.6cm}
|
||||
]
|
||||
% Internal blocks
|
||||
\node (se1) [block]
|
||||
{$\text{SE}_1$ \\ + noise};
|
||||
\node (se2) [block, right=0.5cm of se1]
|
||||
{$\text{SE}_2$ \\ + noise};
|
||||
\node (dots) [right=0.3cm of se2] {\dots};
|
||||
|
||||
% Wires
|
||||
\draw (se1.west) -- ++(-0.4,0);
|
||||
\draw (se1.east) -- (se2.west);
|
||||
\draw (se2.east) -- (dots.west);
|
||||
\draw (dots.east) -- ++(0.4,0);
|
||||
|
||||
% The "Circuit" container
|
||||
\node (box) [
|
||||
container, fit=(se1) (se2) (dots),
|
||||
label={[anchor=north west, xshift=2pt]
|
||||
north west:Complete circuit}
|
||||
] {};
|
||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}[
|
||||
every edge/.style = {draw, -{latex}}
|
||||
]
|
||||
\node (pcm) {Code~/~$\bm{H}_\text{PCM}$};
|
||||
|
||||
\node[
|
||||
rectangle,
|
||||
draw=black,
|
||||
minimum width=2cm, minimum height=1cm,
|
||||
right=of pcm,
|
||||
align=center
|
||||
] (sec) {Single\\ SE Circ.};
|
||||
|
||||
\node[right=of sec] (qc) {\usebox{\innercircuit}};
|
||||
|
||||
\node[right=of qc] (dem) {$\bm{H}_\text{DEM}$};
|
||||
|
||||
\draw (pcm.east) edge[bend left] (sec.west);
|
||||
\draw (sec.east) edge[bend left] ($(qc.west) + (0.22,0)$);
|
||||
\draw ($(qc.east) + (-0.22,0)$) edge[bend left]
|
||||
node[midway, above] {Stim} (dem.west);
|
||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\only<1>{
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.55]{./res/pcm.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\only<2->{
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.55]{./res/windowing.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace*{-5mm}
|
||||
|
||||
\visible<2->{
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\colorbox{red!20}{$\bm{H}_1 \bm{e}_1 = \bm{s}_1$}
|
||||
\hspace{2mm}\rightarrow\hspace{2mm} \hat{\bm{e_1}} = \cdots
|
||||
\hspace{2mm}\rightarrow\hspace{2mm} \bm{s}_2' = \cdots \\
|
||||
\colorbox{ForestGreen!20}{$\bm{H}_2 \bm{e}_2 = \bm{s}_2'$}
|
||||
\hspace{2mm}\rightarrow\hspace{2mm} \hat{\bm{e_2}} = \cdots
|
||||
\hspace{2mm}\rightarrow\hspace{2mm} \bm{s}_3' = \cdots \\
|
||||
\colorbox{blue!20}{$\bm{H}_3 \bm{e}_3 = \bm{s}_3'$}
|
||||
\hspace{2mm}\rightarrow\hspace{2mm} \hat{\bm{e_3}} = \cdots
|
||||
\hspace{2mm}\rightarrow\hspace{2mm} \bm{s}_4' = \cdots
|
||||
% &\hspace{2.25mm}\vdots
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Windowed Decoding}
|
||||
\frametitle{Similarities to Spatially-Coupled LDPC Codes}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.1]{./res/sc-tanner-graph.png}
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.1]{./res/sc-pcm.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
@@ -140,14 +237,29 @@ decorations.pathreplacing, calc}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{An ``Upper Bound'' on the Performance}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \red{Whole vs windowed for min sum and spa, different
|
||||
window sizes }
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Soft- vs. Hard-Information Decoding Behavior I}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \red{Soft vs hard for min sum and spa (4 plots)}
|
||||
\item \red{Different window sizes}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Soft- vs. Hard-Information Decoding Behavior II}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \red{Comparison of numbers of iterations for soft vs hard}
|
||||
\item \red{Convergence analysis}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
@@ -156,10 +268,23 @@ decorations.pathreplacing, calc}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Future Work}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Questions}
|
||||
\vspace*{15mm}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Deeper investigation into difference between hard- and
|
||||
soft-info decoding for BP
|
||||
\item Move from BP to BPGD
|
||||
\item Spend much more effort to decode first window (inspired
|
||||
by rate-loss of SC-LDPC codes in first window)
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{15mm}
|
||||
|
||||
\item Q: Theoretically rigorous proof for the
|
||||
``window-friendly'' structure of the detector error matrix?
|
||||
\item Q: Min-sum seems to perform better than SPA? \red{Make
|
||||
sure this question even makes sense}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user