Start VN and CN indexing from zero
This commit is contained in:
@@ -224,25 +224,25 @@ construction for the [7,4,3]-Hamming code.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\node[VN, label=above:$x_1$] (vn1) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn1, label=above:$x_2$] (vn2) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn2, label=above:$x_3$] (vn3) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn3, label=above:$x_4$] (vn4) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn4, label=above:$x_5$] (vn5) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn5, label=above:$x_6$] (vn6) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn6, label=above:$x_7$] (vn7) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, label=above:$x_0$] (vn1) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn1, label=above:$x_1$] (vn2) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn2, label=above:$x_2$] (vn3) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn3, label=above:$x_3$] (vn4) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn4, label=above:$x_4$] (vn5) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn5, label=above:$x_5$] (vn6) {};
|
||||
\node[VN, right=12mm of vn6, label=above:$x_6$] (vn7) {};
|
||||
|
||||
\node[
|
||||
CN, below=25mm of vn4,
|
||||
label={below:$x_1 + x_3 + x_4 + x_6 = 0$}
|
||||
label={below:$x_0 + x_2 + x_3 + x_5 = 0$}
|
||||
] (cn2) {};
|
||||
\node[
|
||||
CN, left=40mm of cn2,
|
||||
label={below:$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 0$}
|
||||
label={below:$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 0$}
|
||||
] (cn1) {};
|
||||
\node[
|
||||
CN, right=40mm of cn2,
|
||||
label={below:$x_1 + x_2 + x_4 + x_7 = 0$}
|
||||
label={below:$x_0 + x_1 + x_3 + x_6 = 0$}
|
||||
] (cn3) {};
|
||||
|
||||
\foreach \n in {2,3,4,5} {
|
||||
@@ -268,9 +268,9 @@ construction for the [7,4,3]-Hamming code.
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
Mathematically, we represent a \ac{vn} using the index $i \in
|
||||
\mathcal{I} := \left[
|
||||
1 : n \right]$ and a \ac{cn} using the index $j \in \mathcal{J}
|
||||
:= \left[ 1 : m \right]$.
|
||||
\mathcal{I} := \left[ 0:n-1 \right] := \left\{ 0,1,\ldots,n-1 \right\}$
|
||||
and a \ac{cn} using the index $j \in \mathcal{J}
|
||||
:= \left[ 0 : m-1 \right]$.
|
||||
We can then encode the information contained in the graph by defining
|
||||
the neighborhood of a variable node $i$ as
|
||||
$\mathcal{N}_\text{V} (i) = \left\{ j \in \mathcal{J} : \bm{H}_{j,i}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ address both.
|
||||
% Definition of fault tolerance
|
||||
|
||||
We model the possible occurrence of errors during any processing
|
||||
stage as different \emph{error locations} $E_i,~i\in \{1,\ldots,N\}$
|
||||
stage as different \emph{error locations} $E_i,~i\in [1:N]$
|
||||
in the circuit.
|
||||
$N \in \mathbb{N}$ is the total number of considered error locations.
|
||||
The \emph{circuit error vector} $\bm{e} \in \{0,1\}^N$ is a vector
|
||||
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ can add the results from the previous round, as illustrated in
|
||||
\Cref{fig:detectors_from_measurements_general}.
|
||||
We thus have $D=n-k$.
|
||||
Concretely, we denote the outcome of
|
||||
measurement $\ell \in \{1,\ldots,n-k\}$ in round $r \in \{1,\ldots,R\}$ by
|
||||
measurement $\ell \in [1:n-k]$ in round $r \in [1:R]$ by
|
||||
$m_\ell^{(r)} \in \mathbb{F}_2$
|
||||
and define
|
||||
\begin{gather*}
|
||||
@@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ and define
|
||||
\end{pmatrix}
|
||||
.%
|
||||
\end{gather*}
|
||||
Similarly, we denote the outcome of detector $j\in\{1,\ldots,D\}$ in
|
||||
Similarly, we denote the outcome of detector $j\in[1:D]$ in
|
||||
round $r$ by $d_j^{(r)} \in \mathbb{F}_2$ and define
|
||||
\begin{gather}
|
||||
\label{eq:measurement_combination}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -474,9 +474,8 @@ and is difficult to predict beforehand.
|
||||
We briefly reintroduce the notation important for the definition of the windows.
|
||||
We use the variables $n,m \in \mathbb{N}$ to describe the number of
|
||||
\acp{vn} and \acp{cn} respectively.
|
||||
We index the \acp{vn} using the variable $i \in \mathcal{I} := \left\{
|
||||
1,\ldots,n \right\}$ and the \acp{cn} using the variable $j \in
|
||||
\mathcal{J} := \left\{ 1, \ldots, m \right\}$.
|
||||
We index the \acp{vn} using the variable $i \in \mathcal{I} :=
|
||||
[0:n-1]$ and the \acp{cn} using the variable $j \in \mathcal{J} := [ 0 : m-1]$.
|
||||
Finally, we call $\mathcal{N}_\text{V}(i) = \left\{ i\in \mathcal{I}:
|
||||
\bm{H}_{j,i} = 1 \right\}$ and $\mathcal{N}_\text{C}(j) := \left\{ j
|
||||
\in \mathcal{J} : \bm{H}_{j,i} = 1 \right\}$ the neighborhoods of the
|
||||
@@ -487,9 +486,8 @@ check matrix of the underlying code, from which the \ac{dem} was generated.
|
||||
% How we get the corresponding rows
|
||||
|
||||
We begin by describing the sets of \acp{cn} relevant to each window.
|
||||
For indexing, we use the variable $\ell \in \left\{
|
||||
0,\ldots,n_\text{win} - 1 \right\}$, where $n_\text{win} \in \mathbb{N}$
|
||||
is the number of windows.
|
||||
For indexing, we use the variable $\ell \in [0:n_\text{win} - 1]$,
|
||||
where $n_\text{win} \in \mathbb{N}$ is the number of windows.
|
||||
Because we defined the step size $F$ as the number of syndrome
|
||||
extraction rounds to skip, the first \ac{cn} of window $\ell$ should have index
|
||||
$\ell F m$.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user