37 lines
1.2 KiB
TeX
37 lines
1.2 KiB
TeX
\section{Conclusion and Outlook}%
|
|
\label{sec:Conclusion}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}[t]
|
|
\frametitle{Conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Analysis of the general behavior of the two decoding algorithms
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Parameter choice based on decoding performance and time complexity
|
|
\item Verification of theoretical considerations with simulation results
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item Suggestion for improvement of proximal decoding
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Addition of "ML-in-the-List" step
|
|
\item Up to $\sim \SI{1}{dB}$ gain under certain conditions
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item Comparison
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Based on simulation results
|
|
\item Based on their theoretical structure
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\bigskip
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Future work
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Usage of adaptive LP decoding to lower runtime or approximate ML performance
|
|
\item Combination of proximal and LP decoding
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{frame}
|