Wording
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d47bfc947
commit
d38f934123
43
paper.tex
43
paper.tex
@ -129,10 +129,11 @@ Effect of the Choice of Hydration Strategy on Average Academic Performance}
|
|||||||
% \vspace*{-10mm}
|
% \vspace*{-10mm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{abstract}
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||||||
We evaluate the \todo{\ldots} and project that by using the right button of
|
We evaluate the relationship between hydration strategy and
|
||||||
|
academic performance and project that by using the right button of
|
||||||
the water dispenser to fill up their water bottles, students can potentially
|
the water dispenser to fill up their water bottles, students can potentially
|
||||||
gain up to \todo{5 minutes} of study time a day, which is equivalent to
|
gain up to \SI{4.14}{\second} of study time per refill, which is amounts to
|
||||||
raising their grades by up to \todo{0.01} points.
|
raising their grades by up to 0.00103 points.
|
||||||
\end{abstract}
|
\end{abstract}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
|
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
|
||||||
@ -169,13 +170,14 @@ to leverage it to improve the academic performance of KIT students.
|
|||||||
Over a period of one week, we monitored the usage of the water dispenser
|
Over a period of one week, we monitored the usage of the water dispenser
|
||||||
on the ground floor of the KIT library at random times during the day.
|
on the ground floor of the KIT library at random times during the day.
|
||||||
The experiment comprised two parts, a system measurement to determine the
|
The experiment comprised two parts, a system measurement to determine the
|
||||||
flowrate of the water dispenser, and a behavioral measurement, i.e., a recording
|
flowrate of the water dispenser, and a behavioural measurement, i.e.,
|
||||||
|
a recording
|
||||||
of the choice of hydration strategy of the participants: $S_\text{L}$ denotes
|
of the choice of hydration strategy of the participants: $S_\text{L}$ denotes
|
||||||
pressing the left button of the water dispenser, $S_\text{R}$ the right one,
|
pressing the left button of the water dispenser, $S_\text{R}$ the right one,
|
||||||
and $S_\text{B}$ pressing both buttons.
|
and $S_\text{B}$ pressing both buttons.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For the system measurement $10$ datapoints were recorded for each strategy,
|
For the system measurement $10$ datapoints were recorded for each strategy,
|
||||||
for the behavioral measurement $113$ in total.
|
for the behavioural measurement $113$ in total.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% As is always the case with measurements, care must be taken not to alter
|
% As is always the case with measurements, care must be taken not to alter
|
||||||
% quantities by measuring them. To this end, we made sure only to take system
|
% quantities by measuring them. To this end, we made sure only to take system
|
||||||
@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ unknown distribution, the test we chose to verify this observation is a Mann
|
|||||||
Whitney U test. We found that $S _\text{L}$ is faster than $S_\text{R}$ with a
|
Whitney U test. We found that $S _\text{L}$ is faster than $S_\text{R}$ with a
|
||||||
significance of $p < 0.0001$, while no significant statement could be made
|
significance of $p < 0.0001$, while no significant statement could be made
|
||||||
about $S_\text{R}$ and $S_\text{B}$.
|
about $S_\text{R}$ and $S_\text{B}$.
|
||||||
Fig. \ref{fig:Behavior} shows the results of the behavioral measurement.
|
Fig. \ref{fig:Behavior} shows the results of the behavioural measurement.
|
||||||
% During this part of the experiment, we also measured the time each participant
|
% During this part of the experiment, we also measured the time each participant
|
||||||
% needed to fill up their bottle. Using the measured flowrates we calculated
|
% needed to fill up their bottle. Using the measured flowrates we calculated
|
||||||
% the mean refill volume to be $\SI{673.92}{\milli\liter}$.
|
% the mean refill volume to be $\SI{673.92}{\milli\liter}$.
|
||||||
@ -325,21 +327,20 @@ the fastest strategy amounts to $\SI{4.14}{\second}$.
|
|||||||
% \SI{20}{\second}}$
|
% \SI{20}{\second}}$
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Strangely, it is the consensus of current research that there is only
|
Strangely, it is the consensus of current research that there is only
|
||||||
a weak relationship between academic performance and invested time
|
a weak relationship between academic performance and hours studied
|
||||||
\cite{plant_why_2005}. Using the highest determined correlation we
|
\cite{plant_why_2005}.
|
||||||
could find, \todo{$\rho = 0.18$ \cite{schuman_effort_1985}}, we
|
The largest investigation into the matter found a correlation of
|
||||||
estimate an upper bound on the possible grade gain of \todo{0.001}.
|
$\rho = 0.18$ \cite{schuman_effort_1985} between GPA and average time
|
||||||
|
spend studying per day. Using a rather high estimate of 5 refills per
|
||||||
|
day, we predict a possible grade gain of up to $0.00103$ points.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
\section{Discussion and Conclusion}
|
\section{Discussion and Conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Further research is needed to consolidate and expand on the results
|
Further research is needed, particularly on the modelling of the
|
||||||
of this paper, e.g., by expanding on the modelling of the arrival
|
arrival process and the relationship between the response time gain
|
||||||
process or further investigating the relationship between the study
|
the grade gain. Nevertheless, we believe this work serves as a solid
|
||||||
time and the resulting grade for the target demographic.
|
first step on the path towards achieving optimal study behaviour.
|
||||||
Nevertheless, we believe this study serves as a solid first step
|
|
||||||
towards the optimization of the study behaviour of KIT students and
|
|
||||||
thus the betterment of society in general.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Many attempts have been made in the literature to relate
|
% Many attempts have been made in the literature to relate
|
||||||
% the time spent studying to academic achievement - see, e.g.
|
% the time spent studying to academic achievement - see, e.g.
|
||||||
@ -357,12 +358,12 @@ thus the betterment of society in general.
|
|||||||
% \section{Conclusion}
|
% \section{Conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this study, we investigated how the choice of hydration strategy
|
In this study, we investigated how the choice of hydration strategy
|
||||||
affects the average academic performance. We found that always
|
affects average academic performance. We found that always
|
||||||
choosing to press the right button leads to an average time gain of
|
choosing to press the right button leads to an average time gain of
|
||||||
\todo{\SI{10}{\second}} \todo{per day}, which translates into a grade
|
\SI{4.14}{\second} per refill, which translates into a grade
|
||||||
improvement of $\todo{0.001}$ levels. We thus propose a novel and
|
improvement of up to $0.00103$ levels. We thus propose a novel and
|
||||||
broadly applicable strategy to boost the average academic performance
|
broadly applicable strategy to boost the average academic performance
|
||||||
of KIT students: always pressing the right button.
|
of KIT students: always using the right button.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Further research is needed to develop a better model of how the choice of
|
% Further research is needed to develop a better model of how the choice of
|
||||||
% hydration strategy is related to academic performance. We
|
% hydration strategy is related to academic performance. We
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user