diff --git a/latex/thesis/chapters/introduction.tex b/latex/thesis/chapters/introduction.tex
index 1036cc2..b259b0a 100644
--- a/latex/thesis/chapters/introduction.tex
+++ b/latex/thesis/chapters/introduction.tex
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
             \item Error floor when decoding with BP (seems to not be persent with LP decoding
                 \cite[Sec. I]{original_admm})
             \item Strong theoretical guarantees that allow for better and better approximations
-                for ML decoding \cite[Sec. I]{original_admm}
+                of ML decoding \cite[Sec. I]{original_admm}
         \end{itemize}
     \item Results summary
 \end{itemize}
diff --git a/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex b/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex
index 112d1b4..95c71d5 100644
--- a/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex
+++ b/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ figure \ref{fig:theo:channel_overview}.%
     \label{fig:theo:channel_overview}
 \end{figure}
 
-\todo{$\boldsymbol{z}$ is used to denote both the noise and the auxiliary variable for ADMM}
+\todo{Explicitly mention $\boldsymbol{n}$}
 \todo{Mapper $\to$ Modulator?}
 
 The decoding process itself is generally based either on the \ac{MAP} or the \ac{ML}