Replaced Q with overline{Q}
This commit is contained in:
parent
40e731d111
commit
a14ad6d9e5
@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ However, since the number of constraints needed to characterize the codeword
|
||||
polytope is exponential in the code length, this formulation is relaxed futher.
|
||||
By observing that each check-node defines its own local single parity-check
|
||||
code, and thus its own \textit{local codeword polytope},
|
||||
the \textit{relaxed codeword polytope} $Q$ is defined as the intersection of all
|
||||
the \textit{relaxed codeword polytope} $\overline{Q}$ is defined as the intersection of all
|
||||
local codeword polytopes.
|
||||
This consideration leads to the following constraints:%
|
||||
%
|
||||
@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ This consideration leads to the following constraints:%
|
||||
\ldots
|
||||
.\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
In figure \ref{fig:dec:poly} the two relaxations are compared based on an
|
||||
In figure \ref{fig:dec:poly}, the two relaxations are compared based on an
|
||||
example code.
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:dec:poly:exact} shows the codeword polytope
|
||||
$\text{poly}\left( \mathcal{C} \right) $, i.e. the constraints for the
|
||||
@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ equivalent linear program to exact \ac{ML} decoding - only valid codewords are
|
||||
feasible solutions.
|
||||
Figures \ref{fig:dec:poly:local1} and \ref{fig:dec:poly:local2} show the local
|
||||
codeword polytopes of each check node.
|
||||
Their intersection, the relaxed codeword polytope $Q$, is shown in figure
|
||||
Their intersection, the relaxed codeword polytope $\overline{Q}$, is shown in figure
|
||||
\ref{fig:dec:poly:relaxed}.
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ Their intersection, the relaxed codeword polytope $Q$, is shown in figure
|
||||
{$\left( 1, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2} \right) $};
|
||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||
|
||||
\caption{Relaxed codeword polytope $Q$}
|
||||
\caption{Relaxed codeword polytope $\overline{Q}$}
|
||||
\label{fig:dec:poly:relaxed}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
@ -548,12 +548,12 @@ Their intersection, the relaxed codeword polytope $Q$, is shown in figure
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\noindent%
|
||||
It can be seen, that the relaxed codeword polytope $Q$ introduces fractional
|
||||
vertices;
|
||||
It can be seen, that the relaxed codeword polytope $\overline{Q}$ introduces
|
||||
vertices with fractional values;
|
||||
these represent erroneous non-codeword solutions to the linear program and
|
||||
correspond to the so-called \textit{pseudocodewords} introduced in
|
||||
\cite{feldman_paper}.
|
||||
However, since for \ac{LDPC} codes $Q$ scales linearly with $n$ instead of
|
||||
However, since for \ac{LDPC} codes $\overline{Q}$ scales linearly with $n$ instead of
|
||||
exponentially, it is a lot more tractable for practical applications.
|
||||
|
||||
The resulting formulation of the relaxed optimization problem
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user