From 894d80ca904430f95ece00358c07e6fc47e48129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Tsouchlos Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:30:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Minor wording changes; Added MAP and ML equivalence note --- .../chapters/theoretical_background.tex | 21 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex b/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex index 80bf172..9ef72c0 100644 --- a/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex +++ b/latex/thesis/chapters/theoretical_background.tex @@ -24,13 +24,12 @@ For example:% c \in \mathbb{F}_2 &\to \tilde{c} \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] \subseteq \mathbb{R} .\end{align*} % -Additionally, a shorthand notation will be used to denote a set of indices:% +Additionally, a shorthand notation will be used, denoting a set of indices as% % \begin{align*} \left[ m:n \right] &:= \left\{ m, m+1, \ldots, n-1, n \right\}, \hspace{5mm} m < n, \hspace{2mm} m,n\in\mathbb{Z} .\end{align*} -\todo{Not really slicing. How should it be denoted?} % In order to designate elemen-twise operations, in particular the \textit{Hadamard product} and the \textit{Hadamard power}, the operator $\circ$ will be used:% @@ -58,7 +57,7 @@ This is known as modulation. The modulation scheme chosen here is \ac{BPSK}:% \boldsymbol{x} = 1 - 2\boldsymbol{c} .\end{align*} % -The transmitted symbol is distorted by the channel and denoted by +The transmitted symbol is distorted by the channel and denoted as $\boldsymbol{y} \in \mathbb{R}^n$. This distortion is described by the channel model, which in the context of this thesis is chosen to be \ac{AWGN}:% @@ -170,17 +169,23 @@ criterion:% \right) .\end{align*}% % -The \ac{MAP}- and \ac{ML}-criteria are closely connected through -\textit{Bayes' theorem}:% +The two criteria are closely connected through Bayes' theorem and are equivalent +when the prior probability of transmitting a codeword is the same for all +codewords: % \begin{align*} \argmax_{c\in\mathcal{C}} p_{\boldsymbol{C} \mid \boldsymbol{Y}} \left( \boldsymbol{c} \mid \boldsymbol{y} \right) - = TODO + &= \argmax_{c\in\mathcal{C}} \frac{f_{\boldsymbol{Y} \mid \boldsymbol{C}} + \left( \boldsymbol{y} \mid \boldsymbol{c} \right) p_{\boldsymbol{C}} + \left( \boldsymbol{c} \right)}{f_{\boldsymbol{Y}}\left( \boldsymbol{y} \right) } \\ + &= \argmax_{c\in\mathcal{C}} f_{\boldsymbol{Y} \mid \boldsymbol{C}} + \left( \boldsymbol{y} \mid \boldsymbol{c} \right) p_{\boldsymbol{C}} + \left( \boldsymbol{c} \right) \\ + &= \argmax_{c\in\mathcal{C}}f_{\boldsymbol{Y} \mid \boldsymbol{C}} + \left( \boldsymbol{y} \mid \boldsymbol{c} \right) .\end{align*} % -This has the consequence that if the probability \ldots, the two criteria are -equivalent. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%