From 14410e20e74914a7c5ca4876b7da761391c4de16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Tsouchlos <an.tsouchlos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 22:55:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove float specifiers from figures

---
 letter.tex | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/letter.tex b/letter.tex
index e12a4a4..2c94b92 100644
--- a/letter.tex
+++ b/letter.tex
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ the right direction.
 This would suggest that most frame errors occur due to only a few incorrectly
 decoded bits.%
 %
-\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{figure}
     \centering
 
     \begin{tikzpicture}
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ This behavior supports the conjecture that the reason for the high DFR is a
 failure to converge to the correct codeword in the final steps of the
 optimization process.%
 %
-\begin{figure}[h]
+\begin{figure}
     \centering
 
     \begin{tikzpicture}
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ leading to the aforementioned oscillation.
 Second, the gradient of the code constraint polynomial itself starts to
 oscillate after a certain number of iterations.%
 %
-\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{figure}
     \centering
 
     \begin{tikzpicture}
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ The parameters chosen for the simulation are
 $\gamma = 0.05, \omega=0.05, \eta=1.5, K=200$.
 Again, these parameters were chosen,%
 %
-\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{figure}
     \centering
 
     \begin{tikzpicture}